AI & Technology: How to Stop the Enslavement of the Human Race

No ratings yet. Log in to rate.

In 1942, Science fiction writer Isaac Asimov imagined a world of robots and artificial intelligence that catered to our every need, Asimov even theorised laws these robots should live by so they would continue to serve and protect us:
• A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
• A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the first law.
• A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second law.

 

(I, Robot by Isaac Asimov, released 1950.)


Here, in 2017, the time of Asimov’s imagination is truly here as conversations with Siri, Alexa and Google Assistant are now a daily occurrence. Now, we should be looking more than ever if these theorised laws of robotics stand the test of time.

Asimov’s own writings show the perils of these laws, the book iRobot and it’s later film adaptation show enslavement and control of the human race a potential and logical conclusion.

A joint report by the British Academy and the Royal Society presents another theory, that artificial intelligences need only to be governed by one law; Humans must flourish.

This overarching principle, complimented by 4 high level principles:

• Protect individual and collective rights and interests.
• Ensure that trade-offs affected by data management and data use are made transparently, accountably and inclusively.
• Seek out good practices and learn from success and failure.
• Enhance existing democratic governance.


(The Amazon Echo Dot uses the Alexa AI Assistant)


These ‘rules to live by’ for AI should allow us to maintain control over the growing number of artificial intelligences for our benefit, rather than the other way around

While these recommendations, if implemented, may hold off the robot uprising, for now, there are still unanswered questions about our growing relationship with artificial intelligences yet to be debated.

Imagine you're behind the wheel of a self driving car when your brakes fail. As you speed toward a crowded crossing, the AI is confronted with an impossible choice: drive straight into and run over a group of pedestrians, or veer off the road into a potentially fatal crash? Is it the AI’s responsibility to prioritise your life or that of the pedestrians?
 

Comments

No comments have been made. Please log in to comment.
 

Latest News

RGU's Got Talent - Apply Here!

We're searching to find the most talented students at RGU, and we need you to get involved!

 
 

Top stories from Radar

Kingsman: The Golden Circle Review

The action spy comedy featuring cast members Colin Firth, Channing Tatum and Halle Berry was released in the UK in September. The film has already grossed $290 million worldwide but the much-anticipated sequel has received some mixed reviews.

 
Badger Culling in the UK

Bovine tuberculosis is affecting both livestock and wildlife across the UK. Badger culling was proposed as a solution but, has it helped? What is going on in farms and woods? Is culling the right way to deal with tuberculosis?

 
Was 9 Years Enough for OJ Simpson?

OJ Simpson was released from a Nevada correctional center this month. He is widely known for his 1995 acquittal in one of the biggest trials in American history, where he was found not guilty for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson.

 
Sports Premiership Roundup

After a disappointing international break the Scottish Premiership returned with supporters hoping for something to celebrate.