AI & Technology: How to Stop the Enslavement of the Human Race

No ratings yet. Log in to rate.

In 1942, Science fiction writer Isaac Asimov imagined a world of robots and artificial intelligence that catered to our every need, Asimov even theorised laws these robots should live by so they would continue to serve and protect us:
• A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
• A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the first law.
• A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second law.

 

(I, Robot by Isaac Asimov, released 1950.)


Here, in 2017, the time of Asimov’s imagination is truly here as conversations with Siri, Alexa and Google Assistant are now a daily occurrence. Now, we should be looking more than ever if these theorised laws of robotics stand the test of time.

Asimov’s own writings show the perils of these laws, the book iRobot and it’s later film adaptation show enslavement and control of the human race a potential and logical conclusion.

A joint report by the British Academy and the Royal Society presents another theory, that artificial intelligences need only to be governed by one law; Humans must flourish.

This overarching principle, complimented by 4 high level principles:

• Protect individual and collective rights and interests.
• Ensure that trade-offs affected by data management and data use are made transparently, accountably and inclusively.
• Seek out good practices and learn from success and failure.
• Enhance existing democratic governance.


(The Amazon Echo Dot uses the Alexa AI Assistant)


These ‘rules to live by’ for AI should allow us to maintain control over the growing number of artificial intelligences for our benefit, rather than the other way around

While these recommendations, if implemented, may hold off the robot uprising, for now, there are still unanswered questions about our growing relationship with artificial intelligences yet to be debated.

Imagine you're behind the wheel of a self driving car when your brakes fail. As you speed toward a crowded crossing, the AI is confronted with an impossible choice: drive straight into and run over a group of pedestrians, or veer off the road into a potentially fatal crash? Is it the AI’s responsibility to prioritise your life or that of the pedestrians?
 

Comments

No comments have been made. Please log in to comment.
 

Latest News

Student By-election 2019: Candidates & Manifestos

View this year's Student By-election candidates and read their manifestos

 
Student By-election 2019: Candidate Announcement

Nominations for our Student By-election closed this afternoon, and we can now announce the candidates.

 
 

Top stories from Radar

Six tips for finding that work/school balance: Say goodbye to late mark reductions forever

Are you struggling with the stress of your school and work life? Do you need to find a better way to prioritise and stick to deadlines? Well Radar have got some neat tips to create balance in your life.

 
Local Shopping Centre to Raise Awareness of Disabilities

Customers are in for an eye opening experience at Union Square this Tuesday. The giant shopping centre is making alterations to their shopping experience to promote inclusivity and understanding of those with disabilities.

 
Brexit’s Delay: What do Students Think?

Another holiday has passed and with it a deadline- the infamous Brexit deadline. What do Students think? Radar took to the streets to find out.

 
Emoji Explosion: Apple’s Recent Contribution towards Representation

On 28th October, Apple released the iOS 13.2 update to iPhone users, introducing an array of new emojis. Apple's attempt to diversify the keyboard to improve inclusion and representation has been met with praise.